Playbook 5.3

Implementing Management Information Systems That Drive Decisions

How to move from gut-feel management to a monthly MIS that tells you what is actually happening — before it is too late to act

8–12 weeksMedium complexityStage 2–4Verified 21 August 2026

Who this is for

SMEs where financial reporting is backward-looking, delayed, or incomplete — where the promoter learns about a cash shortfall when it arrives, not 6 weeks before. Businesses where decisions are made on instinct rather than data, and where the management team cannot answer basic questions about margin by product, customer profitability, or working capital by division.

What it costs you to ignore it

The absence of a functioning MIS is not a reporting problem — it is a decision-making problem. Every month that passes without accurate, timely management accounts is a month where pricing decisions, hiring decisions, and capital allocation decisions are made on incomplete information. The cumulative cost of those decisions is almost always larger than the cost of building the system.

The diagnosis behind it

This playbook is triggered by a Red or Critical finding on:

Vital 5 — Governance

The Protocol

1

Define the 10–15 numbers that, if you knew them every month, would change how you run the business. Start with: revenue by product/division, gross margin by product/division, debtor days, creditor days, cash balance, and order book. Add sector-specific metrics from there.

Owner
CEO + CFO
Duration
3 days
Cost
Internal time only
Done looks like
MIS metric list agreed; owner assigned for each metric
2

Audit your current data sources: which of these metrics can be produced from your existing accounting software, ERP, or spreadsheets? Which require new data capture? Identify the gaps before designing the system.

Owner
CFO
Duration
1 week
Cost
Internal time only
Done looks like
Data source audit complete; gaps identified
3

Design a single MIS dashboard — one page, not a 40-tab spreadsheet. Use a standard format: actuals vs. budget vs. prior year for the current month and year-to-date. Every metric should have a RAG (red/amber/green) status so the reader knows in 30 seconds where to focus.

Owner
CFO
Duration
2 weeks
Cost
Internal time; consultant support if needed: ₹30,000–₹75,000
Done looks like
MIS template designed; RAG thresholds defined for each metric
4

Set a hard close date: management accounts must be finalised by the 10th working day of the following month. Accounts that arrive on the 25th are not management information — they are history.

Owner
CFO
Duration
1 month (to establish the rhythm)
Cost
Internal time only
Done looks like
First MIS pack produced by day 10; close process documented
5

Hold a monthly MIS review meeting: CEO, CFO, and business unit heads. The agenda is fixed: review actuals vs. budget, identify the top three variances, agree actions. The meeting should take 60–90 minutes, not half a day.

Owner
CEO
Duration
Ongoing
Cost
Internal time only
Done looks like
First monthly MIS review held; action log created
6

After 3 months, review the MIS itself: are the metrics still the right ones, is the data accurate, and are the insights leading to decisions? Adjust the dashboard based on what is actually being used versus what is being ignored.

Owner
CEO + CFO
Duration
1 week
Cost
Internal time only
Done looks like
MIS reviewed and refined; version 2 dashboard agreed

What you can do yourself vs what needs help

Steps 1–2 and 4–6 are entirely internal. Step 3 — designing the MIS template and RAG thresholds — benefits from an advisor who has seen what works in comparable businesses and can compress the design phase from months to weeks.

Regulatory content verified 21 August 2026. Re-verify before acting on any threshold or compliance date.