Playbook 5.2

Cleaning Up Related-Party Transactions Before They Become a Problem

A structured approach to identifying, disclosing, and unwinding the transactions that kill deals and trigger regulatory scrutiny

6–8 weeksMedium complexityStage 2–4Verified 21 August 2026

Who this is for

Promoter-led SMEs where the promoter or their family members have financial dealings with the company — loans, rent, service contracts, or supply arrangements — that have not been formally documented, disclosed, or approved at arm's length. Businesses preparing for institutional investment, a bank facility renewal, or an IPO.

What it costs you to ignore it

Related-party transactions are the single most common reason SME fundraises stall in due diligence. An investor who discovers an undisclosed loan to the promoter, a rent arrangement at above-market rates, or a supply contract with a promoter-owned entity does not ask for an explanation — they reduce the valuation or walk away. The same transactions that felt like normal business practice become a governance red flag the moment an external party looks at the books.

The diagnosis behind it

This playbook is triggered by a Red or Critical finding on:

Vital 5 — Governance

The Protocol

1

Prepare a complete register of all related parties: promoter, promoter family members, entities owned or controlled by the promoter or family, and key management personnel. Include every entity in which any of these persons hold more than 2% equity.

Owner
CFO + CS
Duration
1 week
Cost
Internal time only
Done looks like
Related-party register complete; reviewed by legal counsel
2

Map every financial transaction between the company and any related party in the last 3 years: loans given or received, rent paid or received, service contracts, supply arrangements, guarantees, and asset transfers.

Owner
CFO
Duration
2 weeks
Cost
Internal time; CA support if books are complex: ₹25,000–₹60,000
Done looks like
Complete RPT register prepared with transaction values and terms
3

For each transaction, assess: was it at arm's length, was it approved by the board, and was it disclosed in the financial statements? Transactions that fail any of these tests need to be resolved before diligence.

Owner
CFO + legal
Duration
1 week
Cost
Legal review: ₹20,000–₹50,000
Done looks like
Each RPT assessed; resolution plan prepared for non-compliant transactions
4

Unwind transactions that cannot be justified at arm's length: repay promoter loans, terminate above-market service contracts, and transfer assets at fair value. Document every unwinding with board approval and a valuation certificate where required.

Owner
CEO + CFO + legal
Duration
4–6 weeks
Cost
Valuation certificates: ₹15,000–₹40,000 per asset; legal drafting: ₹20,000–₹50,000
Done looks like
All non-arm's-length transactions unwound; documentation complete
5

For transactions that are genuinely arm's length and commercially justified, obtain retrospective board approval, ensure they are disclosed in the next financial statements, and document the basis for the pricing.

Owner
CS + CFO
Duration
2 weeks
Cost
Internal time; CA fees for disclosure drafting
Done looks like
All retained RPTs approved by board and disclosed in financials
6

Implement a going-forward RPT policy: all new related-party transactions require prior board approval, an arm's-length pricing certificate, and disclosure in the annual report. Assign the CS responsibility for maintaining the register.

Owner
CS + CFO
Duration
1 week
Cost
Policy drafting: ₹10,000–₹20,000
Done looks like
RPT policy adopted by board; CS assigned as register owner

What you can do yourself vs what needs help

Step 1 (register) and Step 6 (policy) are internal. Steps 2–5 — the assessment, unwinding, and documentation — require a CA and a transactions lawyer working together. This is not an area where internal execution without professional support is advisable.

Regulatory content verified 21 August 2026. Re-verify before acting on any threshold or compliance date.